首页> 外文OA文献 >States as gatekeepers in EU asylum politics: Explaining the non-adoption of a refugee quota system
【2h】

States as gatekeepers in EU asylum politics: Explaining the non-adoption of a refugee quota system

机译:欧盟庇护政治中的守门人:解释不采用难民配额制度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Building on Moravcsik’s Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non-decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, e.g. Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility-sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility-sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (i.e. unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilised by right-wing populist parties.
机译:我以莫拉夫西克(Moravcsik)的自由政府间主义为基础,解释了对欧盟永久难民配额的非决定性决定。欧盟庇护政治中一些具有传统影响力的成员国,例如德国,奥地利和瑞典接待了大量难民,并面临强大的国内压力,要求其他会员国参与责任分担。但是,申请数量较少的会员国政府(其中一些东欧国家的政府特别强烈)有动力削减责任分担以避免类似的压力。这些政府可以更好地替代潜在的谈判协议,因此成功地阻止了永久难民配额的引入。除了解释通过不对称的相互依存关系无法有效地解决庇护危机的根本原因之一(即不平等的压力)外,本文还进一步发展了自由政府间论据,并展示了各国选民如何在欧盟层面上影响政府在欧盟一级所采取的立场由右翼民粹党动员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zaun, Natascha;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号